this is a bad news post

It turns out that I have to work on Friday.  Just eight hours, but it’s still a huge chunk of time that could be better spent, and I’m massively sorry.  Selfishly sorry, too.  ‘Cause it sucks.  And in exchange I am getting out of having to go in on Saturday but.  8_8

AND I’M TELLING YOU THIS HERE, ON TUMBLR, SO THAT I CAN SOFTEN THE BLOW WITH LOVELINESS.

Or, you know.  So I could have even more BB on my dash.  Whatever.

ASSUME THAT I AM TEXTABLE TODAY EVEN THOUGH I’M NOT SURE YET.

discowing:

powergirl:

fyeahdickgrayson:

Welllll…

A little bit.

You forgot one:

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TIM DRAKE!!!!

tinyredbird:

(via fuckyeahtimkonslash)

(via shoelust)

COUGH COUGH COUGH

COUGH COUGH COUGH

(Source: fuckyeahshippersquirrel)

nightving:

yes
"

—Do you think Dick Grayson is gay? And, was that what the higher ups nixed?

That was not what was nixed, no, I’ve never actually tried to push for that in any serious way. Personally, I think he’s bisexual. I mean, look at his history — there’s no denying that he likes women. The way I think about him, he likes everyone, he’s sort of a contact junkie — just this incredibly physical (and attractive) person who lives wholly in the corporeal plane and responds with — processes things in — his body before his head or heart. I imagine that he can be hypnotized by a touch the way other people can be stopped dead in their tracks by the sight of money or the promise of true love. I think he likes kicking and kissing in almost equal measure — except kissing edges out ahead because you can do it for longer and it leads to nicer things. It’s difficult to communicate in a comic, but he’s the guy who never stops moving, who touches you a lot when he’s trying to get something across to you, who withholds himself — becoming physically very rigid and distant — when he’s unhappy about something. I’m writing a novel for WB right now that he’s in and I have one scene where Batman has to stop a fight before it gets out of control, and most of the people he can just yell or glare at, but with Dick, he just stands really close behind him and Dick freezes. That’s not supposed to be a sexual thing (though it is kinda hot! ::laughs::), it’s an understanding on Bruce’s part that his physical proximity will speak just as quickly and loudly to Dick as his voice, maybe even be processed faster. And I think a large part of Dick’s rather complicated romantic history has to do with the fact that he can be incredibly focused and intense and intimate in a way most people can’t — when he’s with you, he’s 100% with you — and then he can also get up and just go to the next thing and be 100% there, whether it’s work or, god help you if you’re in love with him, someone else. And he doesn’t mean this at all in the typical “notches in the belt” way, it’s a hunger inside of him, a way of communicating. Think, for a minute, about being an aerialist. Your life depends on latching on to that other person’s wrists — the human touch is literally what saves you.

And now think about being a very physical and naturally gregarious and loving person and growing up with someone like Bruce. Then add in the confusion about his status — a “ward” is something you stop being the minute you turn eighteen. Having already lost his parents and then hurling into adolescence at the speed he did…in my personal version of the story, he develops sexual desire and social anxiety about the future at the same time, and this leads to tremendous confusion, on his part, about his role in Bruce’s life. He can’t be a ward forever, in the back of his head he knows he won’t be Robin forever…what is he to this man who is at once his best friend and personal savior, personal god? “Son” is what they eventually settle on, but I think when Dick was in his late teens, the idea of “lover” must have run through his mind (which means, really, as we’ve already discussed, it ran through his body)…and if in any way Bruce retreated from that advance — which is what I’d expect him to do (he does love the kid, rather wildly really, but that scares him, and it’s not a sexual love, and that would be a perversion of the relationship anyway, and what the hell does he expect me to do!? “Dick, maybe you’d better leave now,”) — then Dick is going to pursue that retreat with the energy of a demon, because that’s what Bruce has taught him to do — pursue what flees. Eventually, much later, Dick gets distracted by other relationships and is able to ease up enough on Bruce for Bruce to relax into his own comfort-level of kindness and affection again (once the threat of sexuality has been removed) and they carry on more or less unharmed. But the relationship remains incredibly powerful and intense for Dick, who ends up feeling apologetic, rejected, and confused on top of all the other issues we already know exist between the two of them. Dick responds to Bruce — or really I should say Batman, since that’s who his relationship is with — on every single level.

But I don’t push that on DCU proper, because I know that it’s more than a lot of people can handle and I want these characters to remain accessible to everyone who loves them. And I’m comfortable with sort of having one version of the character I write for the company and one I keep for myself. The gay community has, so far, done a terrific job of reading what they want to into the Bat-relationships regardless of what we publish. I suspect the straight audience would not be so flexible.

—Further to that, if Dick is gay, what kind of guy is his type?

I actually love this question, it’s very much the kind of thing I enjoy speculating about and playing with. However, in the case of sexuality, I’ve always found attraction way more complex than “types.” If you add Kory and Babs together, you can say that he likes red hair, and I think that’s a fair assumption (who doesn’t?), but other than that, what the hell do those two women have in common? With men, his romantic prototype is Bruce, but there aren’t a lot of men like that out there (hence his wild attraction to women like Helena, who manage to embody some of those qualities anyway). I don’t think, even in my own private writings, that he’s quite comfortable enough with this aspect of his sexuality to have a type — I mean, the guy who would stop him in his tracks would be a little older, very strong, very dominant, and in some kind of horrific emotional pain, but Dick’s not conscious of any of that. He’s more likely, probably, to have time to develop an intimate relationship with another hero (or civil servant — someone whose work might parallel his own and someone who might be able to understand what he does in the world enough to feel comfortable with him doing it), and, for him with his intense loyalty issues, the best case scenario would be someone he already knows and trusts and feels comfortable with — but ultimately it goes back to that sexual “on” switch for him. Type isn’t as important as passion and opportunity. Because of his psycho-sexual makeup, the other key factor would be a sense that he means something to that other man, that his “surrender” is making that man happy, allowing him to bring pleasure to someone (as he was never allowed to do for Bruce). There’s also a sense, if I may be so bold, of needing to be “caught” and “held down” — this going back to the trauma of losing his parents…being strong and passionate and heroic and virile and loving with a woman is fantastic, he lives for that. But he lost both parents. There is also a part of him that longs to be pinned down and loved a little bit savagely and hurt just enough to reassure him that he’s alive.

Man, I’m totally gonna get fired when this comes out….

"

Here’s the whole part where Devin discusses Dick’s sexuality and her OTP.

[An interview with Devin Grayson - Shameless Magazine]

(via discowing)

deandraws:

I can’t believe that so many people are getting so butthurt over this  reboot.
Separating Dick and Damian is heartbreaking, and I will also miss their witty conversations/dynamic/etc. However, I can’t help but think that this is a great opportunity for Damian  to grow and show his readers another side to his personality by sporting Bruce as a partner.
I am pondering though, why are so many people so indignant about DC’s reboot specifically because of an insignificant detail like Nightwing’s outfit lacking finger stripes or his signature blue on black?
I mean, seriously, guys? That’s all? …Finger stripes?
I think those stripes are super sexy too, but you do realize that if Dick did have finger stripes for this reboot, they would likely have nothing to contribute to the progression of Nightwing’s comeback story in  September, right? It only stands to reason that they wouldn’t because  they didn’t in any of the 153 issues of Nightwing, 2 annual issues and countless  cameo appearances in various other titles.Fun fact: Dick did sport a red on black  outfit in Nightwing (issues 112-117), adopting the name “Renegade”. No  one had a problem with it then, so I wonder, why is it so upsetting now? And don’t give me a  bullshit answer like “because they’re sexy and that’s what really matters”. Honestly, are Nightwing’s lack of finger stripes and the color blue really going to discourage you from reading the first issue in September?Pic source: DeanDraws

Putting Dick back in the Renegade costume, as I believe they have, has more of a signifigance than just the lack of finger stripes.  Renegade was Dick’s response to a world that had fallen apart around him and in which he felt he no longer had the right to be a hero.  When he couldn’t stand to be Nightwing anymore because the compromise of Nightwing’s identity by Blockbuster had meant the death of his friends, and because he had been compliant in the subsequent murder of Desmond.
With that in mind:  I WANT FINGER STRIPES, DAMNIT.

deandraws:

I can’t believe that so many people are getting so butthurt over this reboot.

Separating Dick and Damian is heartbreaking, and I will also miss their witty conversations/dynamic/etc. However, I can’t help but think that this is a great opportunity for Damian to grow and show his readers another side to his personality by sporting Bruce as a partner.

I am pondering though, why are so many people so indignant about DC’s reboot specifically because of an insignificant detail like Nightwing’s outfit lacking finger stripes or his signature blue on black?

I mean, seriously, guys? That’s all? …Finger stripes?

I think those stripes are super sexy too, but you do realize that if Dick did have finger stripes for this reboot, they would likely have nothing to contribute to the progression of Nightwing’s comeback story in September, right? It only stands to reason that they wouldn’t because they didn’t in any of the 153 issues of Nightwing, 2 annual issues and countless cameo appearances in various other titles.

Fun fact: Dick did sport a red on black outfit in Nightwing (issues 112-117), adopting the name “Renegade”. No one had a problem with it then, so I wonder, why is it so upsetting now? And don’t give me a bullshit answer like “because they’re sexy and that’s what really matters”. Honestly, are Nightwing’s lack of finger stripes and the color blue really going to discourage you from reading the first issue in September?

Pic source: DeanDraws

Putting Dick back in the Renegade costume, as I believe they have, has more of a signifigance than just the lack of finger stripes.  Renegade was Dick’s response to a world that had fallen apart around him and in which he felt he no longer had the right to be a hero.  When he couldn’t stand to be Nightwing anymore because the compromise of Nightwing’s identity by Blockbuster had meant the death of his friends, and because he had been compliant in the subsequent murder of Desmond.

With that in mind:  I WANT FINGER STRIPES, DAMNIT.